Platform comparison
WordPress vs Next.js + Sanity:
what you rent, what you own.
Quick answer
WordPress is one application that both edits and serves your site, extended by plugins you keep patching. Next.js + Sanity splits it in three: pre-built pages for visitors, an editing studio for your team, and Sanity's hosted content backend holding the words. You give up running the content database yourself and start paying per editing seat; you stop running twenty other people's plugins on your public site. WordPress still wins when a plugin is doing the actual work.
· LastPatch · 12min
WordPress
- 40.3%of all websites run WordPress, so help is everywhere
- 11,334vulnerabilities disclosed in its ecosystem in 2025, up 42%
Next.js + Sanity
- $15a month per editing seat on Sanity's Growth plan; viewers are free
- 10,000documents and 20 seats on Sanity's free plan, at no cost
Vulnerability figures are for 2025. Sanity's prices and plan limits are its published list prices, which change. Every figure is sourced
At a glance
What you'd notice as the owner.
WordPress | Next.js + Sanity | |
|---|---|---|
| Editing day to day | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Two people in one document | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Seeing a change before it is live | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| What the internet can reach | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Monthly patching | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Speed | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Recurring cost | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Your team's logins | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Adding a feature | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Ownership and lock-in | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Finding help | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
Want the cost row with your own numbers? Run the WordPress tax calculator
Under the hood
For whoever signs off on the stack.
Compare the architecture, row by row
WordPress | Next.js + Sanity | |
|---|---|---|
| Language and extension model | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Where the content lives | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Rich text | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Querying | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Admin panel | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Rendering and freshness | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Schema and migrations | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Access control | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Version history | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Scheduling and coordinated launches | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Hosting | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| Security and compliance | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
| License | WordPress | Next.js + Sanity |
The honest part
When WordPress is still the right call.
A plugin is doing the actual work.
Bookings, memberships, an LMS, a directory. If one plugin is the product and nothing replaces it cleanly, rebuilding it is a project, not a migration.
Your marketers redesign pages themselves.
Page builders let non-developers move a layout around on a Friday afternoon. Sanity can offer editable blocks, but a developer defines each block before anyone arranges it.
Everyone needs a login and per-seat pricing is a no.
WordPress accounts cost nothing and there is no limit. Sanity bills every account that isn't a viewer, and its free plan's only writing role is administrator - so a real editorial team lands on a per-seat plan.
The workflow is WordPress-shaped.
An editorial SEO plugin, a form builder, an events calendar, a translation plugin - each one gets rebuilt or replaced. When that list is long, the numbers stop working.
And when we wouldn't pick Sanity either
It's five pages and a contact form.
A brochure site doesn't need a content backend, a seat bill or an API. Pre-built pages with a light editor are cheaper and have no login to defend - the Astro comparison covers that shape.
Better fitA static siteThe content can't sit in someone else's cloud.
A policy that says the database stays on your infrastructure, or a team that won't pay per seat as it grows, wants a CMS you host yourself: MIT-licensed, your own Postgres, no plan tiers.
Better fitNext.js + PayloadIt's an online store.
Payments, card compliance and checkout uptime belong to a commerce platform, not to a content system with a shop bolted on - the WooCommerce comparison has that argument in full.
Better fitA commerce platform
Want the content database on your own servers, with no per-seat bill? WordPress vs Next.js + Payload
FAQ
WordPress vs Sanity, straight answers.
For a content-heavy site, usually - and for the same reason it can be worse: the editor is a hosted service instead of code on your server. Nothing on the public site to patch, real-time co-editing, click-to-edit previews. In exchange you rent the content backend per seat and features get built deliberately.
Yes. Writing, images, drafts, publishing and version history all happen in Sanity Studio, and two people can work on the same document without saving over each other. A developer is needed to change what the site can do - a new kind of page, a new section - the work a plugin used to do.
Its free plan covers 20 seats, 10,000 documents and two datasets, which is enough for plenty of small sites. Growth is $15 a month per seat, viewers free, and adds comments, scheduled drafts, private datasets and 90 days of history. Hosting the site is separate. Prices move, so check the plan page.
Sanity if collaboration is the point: several editors in one document, comments, click-to-edit previews, and a backend nobody on your side runs. Payload if ownership is the point: MIT-licensed, your own database, no per-seat fee as the team grows. The audit says which one fits your site, in writing.
Rankings follow your URLs and content, not the CMS behind them. Every old address is mapped to a 301 redirect before cutover, titles, descriptions and structured data come across, and Search Console is watched for weeks afterward. Pages come out faster than a plugin-heavy theme, which helps, but the redirect map is what protects rankings.
Yes. There is no one-click importer, and Sanity's own migration course teaches a script instead of one-size-fits-all tooling. We export posts, pages, authors, categories, tags and media, convert the HTML into Portable Text, map it onto the new schema, and import it against a copy first. Every old URL gets a redirect.
Sources (27)
- Patchstack - State of WordPress Security in 2026
- W3Techs - WordPress usage statistics
- WordPress - Real-time collaboration removed from 7.0
- Sanity - Pricing and plan limits
- Sanity - Content Lake
- Sanity - Datasets
- Sanity - Schema validation and the Content Lake
- Sanity - Roles and permissions
- Sanity - History retention
- Sanity - Live Content API
- Sanity - GraphQL API
- Sanity - API versioning
- Sanity - Sanity Studio
- Sanity - Deploying the Studio
- Sanity - Embedding the Studio
- Sanity - Visual editing
- Sanity - Next.js integration
- Sanity - Content releases
- Sanity - Security and compliance
- Sanity Studio - MIT license
- GROQ - Query language specification
- Portable Text - Specification
- Sanity Learn - Migrating content from WordPress to Sanity
- Next.js 16.3 release
- Next.js - Self-hosting
- Payload - MIT license
- NVD - CVE-2025-55182 (React Server Components)
Facts checked 11 September 2026. Sanity's plan names, prices and limits are its published list prices and change; re-check them before quoting.